Is data privacy a luxury good?
Posted by Janice Scheckter on 22 May 2019 12:35 PM CAT
About five years ago, I had a less than pleasant encounter with an arrogant, known Johannesburg business personality. In the meeting, while presenting Indigo’s digital platforms, he asked ‘why pay for collaborative space when it’s free on Google Drive’? I hope for his sake, that he has not built his platforms, community engagement and knowledge repositories on Google Drive. Here's why.
I knew then that in our business, we were following a path of data integrity but what I didn’t realize were the pernicious levels of data infringement out there.
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, according to Roger Macnamee, are all guilty of serious data privacy infractions. Macnamee, a tech venture capitalist and early mentor to Mark Zuckerberg, recently published Zucked, a New York Times bestseller. Macnamee who is also a Facebook investor unpacks the serious damage Facebook is doing to our society - and sets out to try to stop it.
Facebook’s recent data privacy breaches included one that saw the Silicon Valley tech giant share data with more than 150 companies that include automakers and media organisations. Spotify, Netflix and the Royal Bank of Canada were able to read, write and delete Facebook users’ private messages, and to see everyone on a message thread. Facebook let Microsoft’s Bing search engine see the names of virtually all Facebook users’ friends without consent.
Google uses Gmail to track a history of things you buy, and it’s hard to delete. CEO Sundar Pichai wrote a New York Times op-ed that said: “privacy cannot be a luxury good.” But behind the scenes, Google is still collecting a lot of personal information from the services you use, such as Gmail, and some of it can’t be easily deleted.
Google’s privacy page says that only you can view your purchases. But it says “Information about your orders may also be saved with your activity in other Google services” and that you can see and delete this information on a separate “My Activity” page.
Except you can’t. Google’s activity controls page doesn’t give you any ability to manage the data it stores on Purchases.
Microsoft’s privacy statement says the following. ‘Microsoft collects data to help you do more. To do this, we use the data we collect to operate and improve our software, services, and devices, provide you with personalized experiences and to help keep you safe. These are some of the most common categories of data we collect.’
And if any of this is new to you and you’re not completely freaked out, colour me surprised! According to a study conducted by professors at the University of Utah and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, major tech companies such as Facebook, Google, Twitter, and Microsoft played an unprecedented role in political campaigns during the 2016 election. The study reports that an unusually high amount of “surrogate staffers”, one from Google, three from Microsoft, and two from both Facebook and Twitter, joined forces with Trump’s 2016 election team’s assembly of digital experts.
Is it simply a trade-off? We have more access to information than ever before and it’s ‘sort of free’. Do we need to trade-off against privacy? It’s a tough one. Who doesn’t love at least one of these platforms? Google mail’s corporate accounts are great to use, but the truth is that behavioural analytics are being extracted all the time.
We do however need to be more vigilant, I think. When data privacy is breached it gives governments more power, it gives the private sector more power, it could potentially start diminishing free speech and thought.
Being early in our journey where our platforms are gathering data, we discussed how we have the opportunity to retain the integrity and we’ve adopted as a value, Respect the Data.
Janice Scheckter, CEO, Indigo New Media. Creating communities that count and respecting their data.
New York Times